Saturday, 1 May 2010

Thriller - The Final Product


Here is our final Thriller opening. Enjoy!
I feel that the music we used worked really well, and it was rather easy to choose after the video had been made. Mainly we looked at the "Donnie Darko" soundtrack, and found that Roland Orzabal's cover version of Tears for Fears' Mad World worked nicely with the opening scene, especially with the line "All around me are familiar faces," to portray that they were all in the killer's year at school.


Feedback
Initially, our police scene was longer, as it had another character being introduced, and given the story in full.
However, when we showed this to people we got comments such as:
"The camera shots you've chosen are good, especially how it's framed in the coffee shop scene"

"I think the police seen is too long. The start and end is good, but the middle bit drags on a little."

"The music works really well. The way it carries on to the detective scene makes them sound more desperate to solve it'
In regard to this, we decided to make the police scene shorter, as it would ensure the audience's attention is kept. Unfortunately, we had to do this by cutting out the third police officer altogether, but I feel it works better.
After the re-editing of the video, our feedback was much more positive:
"I really liked it. the sound was really good and the editing was clever. and I think the story is good and I would want to see the rest if it was an actual film"

"I like it.
I think it's really good, the ending's reminiscent of the silence of the lambs
and good editing."

"it's much better now you've cut it down, it keeps my attention for longer. I'd want to see the rest of it"
"It provides an omnipresent feeling of nostalgia by use of musical patterning, angle switches and a general aura of darkness. The ending provides a cliffhanger which can be used in further reference to the final video."

Thriller - Evaluation

In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge the forms and conventions of real media products?

I feel that our thriller has included many forms and conventions already familiar in the genre, but also developed some of the ideas. For example, we had a typically male protagonist, but we had two, our detectives, instead of just one. Our antagonist is introduced at the beginning, instead of being hidden till the end. This is typical in thrillers, as the film is usually about how they are stopped, not revealing their identities. Our film is not set in an exotic location, like a lot of thrillers, so that is one way that our thriller challenges the conventions of a real thriller. We had our protagonist(s) involved in some kind of puzzle solving, working out the case, and I think if we’d have taken it further, the film would follow the detectives in their solving of the case, as well as an emotional battle between the proatagonist and the antagonist, which is prominent in most thrillers.

How does your media product represent particular social groups?
When looking at our thriller, we have shown two main “groups”: The detectives, and the killer. Although we didn’t set out to represent any social group in any particular way, it is obvious that our detectives are hard working, resourceful and intelligent. This is evident from their working out of the puzzle that is the case, “Hang on – it says here Jason Crook was in their year as well”. With the killer, we wanted, through the use of the internal voice, to show the internal struggles that people who have disorders, such as schizophrenia, endure, and how hard it must be for them.
 
What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
I feel that, in terms of distribution, a media institution such as Warner Bros might be good to distribute our product. This is because they are big companies, and can distribute the film to cinemas all over the country, especially as Warner Bros owns a lot of cinemas over the country. I feel that cinema would be relevant for our thriller, as it makes towards an overall more intense experience, which is what we were trying to achieve.

Who would be the audience for you media product?
Our thriller is mainly based at an audience of late teens onwards, as I feel that age would be able to understand the psychological aspect included in our piece, such as the killer’s schizophrenia. When we looked at the different regulations by the BBFC, we decided that our thriller should be a 15 rating as, even though our introduction contains no violence, it is one of the main conventions of a thriller, and if we’d carried the film on, we’d have liked a couple of fight scenes in there.

What have you learnt about technologies from the process of construction this product?
I personally learnt a lot about the editing process from constructing this project, and have improved my skills greatly on “iMovie”. Also, I learnt a lot about the filming process, in terms of the camera. I can now recognise and execute different camera angles, shots and movements, and I feel I know now how to take a fuller advantage of the camera’s capabilities.

How did you attract/address your audience?
We tried to attract our audience in several different ways. For example, our opening shots were shown on two different desks, in two different places. This was intended so the audience would question the meaning of it, enticing them further. The split-second “x-ray” flash on the next victim was used to draw the audience’s attention to it, and their thoughts are confirmed when the victim is seen walking past our killer. By introducing our audience to a murder case, we hoped the audience would want to learn more, especially as the detectives find some “new” to the case.

Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?
I feel that we have learnt from our mistakes in the preliminary task, in terms of making an overall less amateur production. For example, on one of the shots of our preliminary task, we can see the shadow of the camera on the wall. We worked hard not to make these mistakes again, and made sure the camera was not intrusive, in terms of reflections and shadows. Also we’ve learned that holding our audience’s attention is important. In our preliminary task, our opening shots are just James walking for half a minute. We realise now that this is not the best way to go about engaging our audience. As such, we tried to contain our thriller with enticing information that will attract the audience to know more. I feel we chose the different shots more careful than before, as we framed a lot of them well.

My favourite part of our thriller opening is the scene in which our killer is introduced. I feel that the use of the internal voice was very effective to showing the struggles of our killer. I like very much the framing of his face in the mirror, and how that was contrast with the other shot from the side. As the killer slammed the door, I liked the slick use of editing (the cut to black) to show that the outside world is the truly dark and mysterious place.

Thursday, 15 April 2010

Here are just a few behind-the-scenes footage of our thriller piece, which should be posted up here in the next couple of weeks.





Monday, 15 March 2010

Thriller Planning - The Script


Media Studies Script
Scene one: Killer in the hotel (bathroom scene)
Voice: You don’t have to do this; you do know that don’t you?
It’s not going to change anything.
Killer: Shut up! Just get out. I’m not listening to this again.
Voice: You know I’m right.
Killer: That’s it. I’m going, and you’re not coming with me this time.
*Killer walks out of bathroom
Voice: Do you really think I’m that easy to get rid of?

Oh, c’mon, it’s been years now. Besides, you’d be lonely without me.
*Killer walks out
Scene two: Police investigation room
Detective one: I dunno jack. We’ve been at this case for two months now and we don’t seem to be getting anywhere. We’re missing something, I’m tellin’ you.
Detective two: Look, talk like that’s gonna get us nowhere is it? We need to look more carefully. What is it about these people that makes someone want to kill them? Is there anything we’ve missed, anything that they all have in common?
Detective one: Well, they were all in the same year at school, we’ve established that, and James Greenwood was in their year, Phillip Mason was in the year above.
*Pause
Hang on; Jason Crook was in their year as well. It was his third school in two years. Says here he was removed for unusually disruptive behavior, looks like there were quite a few serious incidents he was involved in.
*Head officer walks through door accompanied by detective three.
H.O: Afternoon, you two. This is Thomas Green, he’s a specialist who’s been assigned to help you on the case. I’ll leave you to it.
Detective three: Right, what’s the story so far gentlemen?
Detective Two: Well, we’ve got a list of suspects that we’ve managed to narrow down to the 6 that are on the board. Three of those went to the same school as all four murder victims and it seems that Jason Crook had a bit of trouble in his school years, it could just be teenage behavior, but it did state that he was unusually disruptive... could be a lead, so we’re gonna check it out.
Detective three: Sounds like a plan.
*Pauses
Would I be able to have a mill over the papers and files? So I can get all the details and what have you.
Detective two: Sure.
Detective three: Thanks
*Walks out the room
Scene three: outside the police station.
Detective two: Not sure what to make of that guy really.
Detective one: He seemed a bit, odd. Anyhow, I don’t like the way they made it feel like we couldn’t handle it
Detective two: No, but I’m welcoming help. He just didn’t seem quite with it. Ah well, maybe he’s just awkward with new people.

Wednesday, 3 February 2010

Thriller Planning - The Story

After discussion, we decided we wanted the opening to portray both a murderer, and those trying to catch him, juxtaposing good and bad. We decided that, for the police part, we should introduce a new character, a new detective on the case. That way, as he is being familiarised with the story, so then is the audience.

The Plot
In the introduction, we see two scattered collections of photographs, one of which is the killer's, and one of which is the detective's.There have been a series of muders, and all of the victims were in the same year at school. Working on the case for two months, our detectives have narrowed down the suspects to eight, which are displayed, with annotations, on a board. They notice that one of the suspects is in the same year as them. As they are discussing this, a new character, the new cop on the case, is introduced. The two detectives tell the new guy the story of the case.
Meanwhile, our killer is introduced, washing his hands, representing his compulsion for hygiene. Hearing voices in his head, we realise that he is schizophrenic. The voice is telling him not to kill again, but he ignores it, and walks out the door.
We then see our killer waiting in a coffee shop, stirring his coffee and taking a sip. He turns around to see a man walking down the alley adjacent to the coffee shop. We see a quick flashback of the man, as one of the photographs at the beginning, and then our killer stands up and walks after him, and then it fades to black.

Storyboard
 This is our opening shot, a pan across two different sets of photographs. One set is on a light coloured table, whilst the other is on a dark one. Although not evident from this picture, we want to have one set have blue annotations on, whilst the others have red annotations. This is meant to show the difference between the killer and the detectives.


The shot then tilts up from the desk, revealing board with eight pictures of suspects on. One of the pictures is zoomed in on, the face of the killer, and then a dissolve transition is made.

The shot dissolves to the face of our killer, looking into the mirror, getting ready to kill again. From this we show the killer arguing with the voice inside his head.

When he replies to these voices, we see a different shot, further implying his schizophrenia

We see the killer exit the bathroom and walk down the stairs.

The voice inside the killer's head argues with him as he goes to leave, and stops when the killer slams the door shut.

We then cut to our two detectives at a loss about where the case is leading them. Here, they notice that one of the suspects, our killer, was in the same year at school as all of the victims, and was "unusually disruptive".

As they are talking, the head inspector walks in and introduces a third detective to the case.

We will then have the two officers telling the new one what has happened so far.

We then cut to a shot of our two police officers talking outside the police station, expressing their doubts about the new detective.

As they are talking, we see one of the victims walk past them. The camera tracks him down an alley.


We cut to the killer drinking his coffee inside a coffee shop. We see the victim walk past the window, and our killer get up and follows him.

We hope to use Café Nero for this, because the large windows would make it easier to track the victim, and have contacted them about it. However, we are awaiting reply.



















Monday, 1 February 2010

"Psycho" Analysis

It is in no doubt that Alfred Hitchcock's "Psycho" is one of the landmark films in the twentieth century. This is because of the boundaries it breaks, the lengths that it went through to capture the audience. It does so in a variety of ways.
One of the best ways in which Hitchcock made this film so successful was his ability to shock the audience without the use of gore and blood. In the shower scene, for example, we see the death of Marion Crane (played by Janet Leigh), who was the main character up to this point. Looking back at the scene, I saw that there was actually very little blood, apart from that going down the plug hole, and during the "stabbing", we never once see a knife penetrating skin. One of the main ways Hitchcock was able to do this was through the musical score. His "muted strings" are still renowned today for their ability to add tension to the film.
The shower scene also presents us with another of Hitchcock's devices that broke the normal boundaries, and that was the amount of nudity used. Most nudity was not permitted in films of the '60s, or frowned upon at best. So, to have a naked woman murdered in the shower was no easy task in it's context. Also, at the start of the film, we see Janet Leigh, in a brassiere, with her lover.This is ground breaking, as previously promiscuity such as this was frowned upon. However, Hitchcock does not make a big attempt to shock the audience with graphic imagery, he simply lets it be there.
Another way in which Hitchcock broke the previous rules was his killing off of Janet Leigh, by the end of the first half of the film. We originally follow the story of her stealing $40,000 off her boss, and the detective attempting to go after her. However, when she is killed, the story of the money is buried, along with her car, when Norman Bates (played by Anthony Perkins) pushes it into the bayou. As he is packing up her things, ready to sink them into the swamp, we are constantly drawn towards the money, wrapped inside a newpaper. We wonder whether he will find it, and that tension brings us to the edge of our seats. As the money sinks with the car, we are left wondering where this story will lead us. As Janet Leigh was a major star at the time, killing her off halfway through the film seemed to be a bad thing to do, but Hitchcock made this work, and more importantly, allowed Anthony Perkins a major role that allowed us to see into the mind of the killer.
Hitchcock broke the boundaries by the twist that's introduced at the very end. Norman Bates claims to have a mother, and we hear her voice in one scene, and the tale is set up to reveal that his mother is the killer. We see this when, in the shower scene, we see that the one with the knife is a womanly shaped figure with her hair in a bun. It is also shown when Norman Bates is arguing with his mother, and taking into the the basement to "be safe". However, when Marion's sister Lila (played by Vera Miles) enters the basement and whispers "Mrs. Bates" to the old woman staring at the wall, we see that she is long dead. Just as the audience are getting their heads around this, Norman Bates enter the room in a wig and dress, with a knife in his hand. I definitely wasn't expecting this, and it's twists such as these that have given Alfred Hitchcock his legendary status.
In conclusion, I feel that Hitchcock crafted Psycho expertly to keep the audiences attention at all times. This was done through the musical score, the storyline and twists, and the contextual risqué amounts of nudity and violence.

Saturday, 30 January 2010

First Planning into our Thriller

 Towards the end of filming our continuity piece, we decided to spend a lesson discussing the sub-genre of our thriller, as well as who we could use to act, and where it could be shot.


Genre?
Crime thriller
Psychological thriller
Horror thriller
Action thriller

Possible locations?
The chase
Old St Georges
Brocton
School
The lane





Possible actors?(our friends who are willing to participate)
Ellis
Joe
James w.
James f.
Mike
Sisters, brothers, etc.
John

After discussion, we decided that it would be best to make a "crime" thriller, as the introduction could work to familiarise the audience with the "case" that would be investigated in the film. For the actors involved, we found it would be best to use our friends, and ourselves, as it's generally easier, and we don't have to pay them. In terms of location, We've written down a bunch of places that are easily accessible, and free to film on. Although not written on this paper, we decided that we would like the killer to be sitting in a coffee shop, waiting for his next victim.